Commercial
enterprises,
by
choice,
do not
wish to
expend
resource,
time and
money
resolving
disputes
because it diverts focus from the
business, can damage trading relationships and undermines profitability.
The impact and effect of disputes can be reduced by taking early,
proactive specialist advice. Such advice can be sought at both
the pre-contract or post-contract stage of the process.
Construction
disputes
mainly
arise
due to
opinions
being
formed
about a
party's legal rights, obligations and risk by interpretation of the facts
and the law.
Anecdotal evidence suggests many disputes can be avoided by
simply ensuring the parties' respective rights, obligations and risk are
made clear in the contract documents
because much time and money is spent
resolving uncertainty.
Essentially, construction disputes are about resolving disputed facts and
disputed law.
|
Sometimes, complex legal issues arise over contract formation and/or the true
meaning and effect of specific contract terms.
Early advice is essential to set a strategy and campaign to effectively dispose
of all matters in dispute.
There are various
adjudicative
and
non-adjudicative techniques available to resolve construction disputes.
The most
common are; negotiation, litigation, arbitration, adjudication, mediation,
conciliation, expert determination and dispute review boards.
Nigel is
a
practicing
Barrister,
Chartered
Quantity
Surveyor,
Chartered
Arbitrator
and
Panel
Registered
Adjudicator
with
over 35
years’
experience
of the
building
and
civil
engineering
industry
combining
a unique
blend of
academic
qualification
and
experience
in
dispute
avoidance/resolution
techniques.
Nigel
receives
tribunal
appointments
and also
provides
advice
and/or
representation
to
party’s2.
For more
details,
please go to
my
Curriculum
Vitae
page.
2
Nigel is a
practising
Barrister at
3PB
Barristers
and must
comply with
the relevant
parts of the
Bar
Standards
Board
Handbook
which
includes the
Code of
Conduct for
barristers.
|